I know this is not a new topic, and I'm sure we a have gone thru this debate before on which one is better. We I wanna ook at this from a different perspective. I have read many debates online on who's gonna get what system and why. Many want the PS3 because they liked the original PS and PS2. Others say the PS2 had better games so PS3 will be their choice of course. And then there are those who get really technical a believe that the PS3 will be technologicaly superior to the Xbox 360. But m fav one is the Xbox is from Microsoft and Microsoft has Bill Gates and makes the Windows OS so it's bound to suck. Most of these reasons can be said about the Xbox 360, the Bill Gates one could be an advantage rather than a disadvantage to others.
So lets take a small look and compare these 2 systems side by side to see what we've got:
Sony PlayStation 3
1. All-in-one Entertainment System. Plays games, DVD movies and music.
2. Online capabilities.
3. Wireless controllers.
4. Fully backwards compatible. All PS and PS2 games will play.
5. Lacks a Hard Drive, for now.
6. Cell Processor PowerPC-base Core @3.2GHz
7. Price: $500 +- US
Microsoft Xbox 360
1. All-in-one Entertainment System. Plays games, DVD movies and music.
2. Online capabilities.
3. Wireless controllers.
4. Partially backwards compatible. Only select games will be played.
5. Hard Drive
6. Custom IBM PowerPC-based CPU 3 symmetrical cores at 3.2 GHz each
7. Price: $399 US
As you can see the systems are similar when it comes to features. Keep in mind that I am using the Xbox 360 more expensive version. The basic version, which cost $299 US, lacks almost everything on that list. All it has is the basic box, a wired controller and online capabilities.
So the infamous question; what system are you gonna get? In the end it will all come down to power, graphics and the game library. But… why settle for just one system? Some people have particular titles that they like that are only made for one of the systems. Take Zelda for example, only Nintendo caries the series and I’m a big fan of the Zelda games. I owned a PS2 and a GameCube, and I say owned because my younger child broke both systems. Trust me this will not be a situation that will repeat itself. I got a taste of the Xbox and thought it was a pretty good system, the graphics were much better than the PS2 and some of the titles were definitely much better. But the way I see it why have only one system? Every system has something I like and the fact that the PS3 cost $? And the Xbox cost $399 would tell me that if I could afford one of them I can definitely afford the other, eventually. While I’m at it I can throw in the Nintendo Revolution to keep up with my Zelda and Mario series. In any case my kids will love all of them and will treat them like they were made of glass. After all each system will be released at different times giving you enough time to gather the money for the new system. I highly believe that you should experience each system before making a decision on which is better.
I for one will have all 3 systems and an awesome PC for all the PC games and life will be a little bit better.
So what do you think? One system, two or all?